jakejakewhat (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

you sir, are awesome. big props from cali

OgeronimonominoregO (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"The liberty of a pregnant woman." The life and liberty of the child.

hornetobiker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You obviously can't read or remember what you have posted yourself wee man. Sad.

ls1z28chris (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I didn't accuse you of having political allegiances, old man. I simply said you're living under a false paradigm. Thank you for proving my point.

hornetobiker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Wrong again! I have no political allegiances. My point was about the blurring of ideological borders. And they are NOT inconsequential. Only a yank who's never been anywhere else would come up with this. Just wishful thinking on the part of a simpleton.

ls1z28chris (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

People like you are going to argue liberal/conservative democrat/republican for your entire life while your liberty is taken regardless of who is in office or which ideology is in ascendancy.

ls1z28chris (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Alternate history? WTF are you talking about?The distinction between socialism and communism are inconsequential to someone who prefers liberty as it makes no difference to him if his freedom is taken by "the people" or by the corporatist state. A person with that world view only sees liberty and tyranny. The distinctions between the means by which his liberty is taken are--wait for it--inconsequential/irrelevant/meaningless.

hornetobiker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

IOW you mean you're an alternate history ideologue too?

ls1z28chris (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

There is often not ignorance of the distinction, but simply the knowledge that those distinctions are inconsequential.

KenCat1337 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Socialism and Neoconservatism are FAR different. Look up Libertarian Socialism, they're not your average socialist and I think they've got it perfect.