left.html

SU-47 vs MIG 1.44. Who is the BEST?


Su-47 (S-37) Berkut Experimental Fighter Aircraft, RussiaThe Sukhoi Design Bureau of Moscow, Russia has developed the Su-47 (previously called the S-37 Berkut or Golden Eagle) fighter aircraft, which first flew in September 1997. Su-47 is in a forward swept wing configuration and uses a highly unstable triplane (with three main lifting surfaces) aerodynamic configuration. The Su-47 completed the first stage of flight trials in December 2001. In May 2002, Sukhoi was selected as prime contractor for the next-generation Russian PAK FA fighter programme. The PAK FA will be a development of the Su-47 but without the forward swept wings.MANOEUVRABILITYThe Su-47 has extremely high agility at subsonic speeds enabling the aircraft to alter its angle of attack and its flight path very quickly, and it also retains manoeuvrability in supersonic flight. Maximum turn rates and the upper and lower limits on air speed for weapon launch are important criteria in terms of combat superiority. The Su-47 aircraft has very high levels of manoeuvrability with maintained stability and controllability at all angles of attack.Maximum turn rates are important in close combat and also at medium and long range, when the mission may involve engaging consecutive targets in different sectors of the airspace. A high turn rate of the Su-47 allows the pilot to turn the fighter aircraft quickly towards the next target to initiate the weapon launch. The swept-forward wing, compared to a swept-back wing of the same area, provides a number of advantages: higher lift to drag ratio; higher capacity in dogfight manoeuvres; higher range at subsonic speed; improved stall resistance and anti-spin characteristics; improved stability at high angles of attack; a lower minimum flight speed; and a shorter take-off and landing distance.FUSELAGEThe Su-47 fuselage is oval in cross section and the airframe is constructed mainly of aluminium and titanium alloys and 13 per cent by weight of composite materials.The nose radome is slightly flattened at the fore section and has a horizontal edge to optimise the aircraft's anti-spin characteristics.The Mikoyan Project 1.44/1.42 is a Russian Air Force prototype fifth-generation air-superiority fighter aircraft. Apart from a number of names along the lines of "Object/Project 1.44/1.42", the aircraft is also known as the MiG-MFI. It was unofficially known for a time as "MiG-35", although MiG is now using this designation for the export version of the MiG-29OVT. The MFI has also been referred to by some sources as MiG-39. Despite the prototype status of the 1.44/1.42, NATO has assigned the reporting name "Flatpack" to this aircraft. The relationship between the 1.44 and 1.42 designations is unclear outside the military world, and these are generally used interchangeably. For simplicity, the 1.44 designation is used throughout this article.DevelopmentThe MiG 1.44/1.42 has been shrouded in mystery throughout the course of its existence. The Russian government cancelled the MFI program in 1997 due to the unacceptably high per-unit cost of the aircraft (Ф2.05 billion RUR, US$70 million). Development continued, with the first test flight taking place on February 29, 2000 and two confirmed test flights in 2001. In Russia's abandonment of the MFI program, the PAK FA (Перспективный Авиационный Комплекс Фронтовой Авиации - Perspektivnyi Aviatsionnyi Kompleks Frontovoi Aviatsyi - Prospective Air Complex for Tactical Air Forces) program was initiated for the development of an aircraft designed to fill a role similar to that of the F-22, and come at a size and cost similar to that of the F-35 Lightning II.In 2001, India agreed with Russia to make the PAK FA program a development/production joint-venture between the two nations. Both Mikoyan-Gurevich and Sukhoi submitted concepts to the Defense Ministry for the PAK FA program (MiG entering an updated Project 1.44), but the Russian Defense Ministry selected the Sukhoi Design Bureau as the primary contractor for the PAK FA fighter. Design work has commenced on a backward-swept winged derivative of Sukhoi's experimental Su-47 Berkut aircraft. PAK FA proves to be a very ambitious program, with production of the PAK FA fighter planned to commence in 2010. MiG-MAPO and Yakovlev have also been mentioned as secondary contractors. The MiG 1.44 is currently serving as a technology demonstrator for the PAK FA program. The in-development PAK FA aircraft will use the same in-development Lyulka AL-41F engine planned for the 1.44.

Channel: Autos & Vehicles
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: 01e9

Length: 02:55
Rating: 4.66
Views: 163694

Tags: 1.42  aircraft  aviation  F-22  f-35  fighter  jet  mig-1.44  Mig-29  military  Russian  su-27  su-47  war  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

Frintessa (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
liar
Jaewon12345 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
instead of argueing F-22 vs Su-47 which will be better, lets say they're not the best planes. I say Flyer III with mounted machine gun owns both =)
piwright42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Because Indian programmers attend college in the US and then take their education back to India.
piwright42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes forward swept wings allow the plane to be controllable at higher angles of attack. The outer flaps still have air flow even when the inboard portion of the wing has lost laminar air flow. Combined with thrust vectoring this plane would have been rude in a dog fight. Unfortunately the current composite materials cannot cope with wing twist on a long term basis. Rumor suggests that there was structural weakening in wings of the SU47 prototype.
piwright42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
From what I heard the PAK-FA was canceled due to cost overruns. The closest the PAK-FA came to existing was the SU47 and there was only one made, the second flyable prototype was dropped. If the PAK-FA ever exists it will be a SU47 with conventional wings because issues with the poor structural integrity of the forward swept layout. Current composite materials just are not up to the task of dealing with high speed wing twist generated in a forward swept wing.
Nik02pun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So can someone explain what are the ups and downs of the su-47 wings?
buignerry (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and at last what about with the 'third building' which also collapsed !!!! it wasnt hit it was intact !!and collapsed like the other two !!
buignerry (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
WTC could handle not one but even more from 747 ,even if the whole building would collapse the core of the building was a concrete pole which should be there even the building collapsed.I heard this from the people who DESIGNED the building.
swiftyread (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
psst - it never really happened at all - it was all filmed in hollywood. I live in Arlington, where the pentagon IS - it was an aircraft my friend - it flew right over my condo before the hit. - I saw the video of the Pentagon hit too - what makes you think its a missile?-The Precession explosive 4 the WTC was a 747 or 2.Put the pipe down, stay away from conspiracy blogs and go to church.Check out what? Are women not supposed to go to factories?
amamam42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That's as funny as hell.